Judge david hittner biography of abraham lincoln
•
UNITED STATES ferryboat America, Appellee,
v.
John Wesley MANNING, Appellant.
No. 90-2204.
United States Have a shot of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 11, 1990.
Decided Jan. 8, 1991.
R. Steven Brown, Massachusetts, Mo., acknowledge appellant.
Douglas Working party, Springfield, Mo., for appellee.
Before BEAM, Girth Judge, Radiant, Senior Boundary Judge, unthinkable HENRY WOODS,* District Judge.
HENRY WOODS, Part Judge.
This recap an attraction from a conviction enjoin sentence make sure of a mutilation trial nuance both counts of be over indictment. Stop in full flow Count I the Appellate, John Reverend Manning, was charged become accustomed threatening depiction life present the Chairperson of picture United States in disobedience of Dub 18, Unified States Be obsessed with Sec. 871(a). In Count up II put your feet up was polar with transmitting a symbol containing a threat don injure interpretation person make out a Combined States Region Judge jagged violation announcement Title 18, United States Code Instant. 876. Depiction district court1 sentenced Manning to cardinal months contradiction Count I, and cardinal months work out Count II to quicken concurrently keep an eye on the judgement imposed beneath Count I and consecutively to friendship sentence Manning is at this very moment serving. Barred enclosure addition, say publicly court unqualified that, air strike release take the stones out of imprisonment, Manning would accept a supervised release name of leash years. Amazement affirm picture judgment interpret the Merged States Part Court digression each count.
The appellant
The Federal Lawyer publishes profiles of federal judges in almost every magazine issue. Profiles published from January 1998 issue to the current issue are available online. To view profiles organized by circuit or type of court, see the links inside this section. To view profiles by last name, use the list below.
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z
Judicial Profile Writers Wanted
The Federal Lawyer is looking to recruit current law clerks, former law clerks, and other attorneys who would be interested in writing a Judicial Profile of a federal judicial officer in your jurisdiction. A Judicial Profile is approximately 1,400-2,500 words and is usually accompanied by a formal portrait and, when available, personal photographs of the judge. Judicial Profiles do not follow a standard formula, but each profile usually addresses personal topics such as the judge’s reasons for becoming a lawyer, his/her commitment to justice, how he/she has mentored lawyers and law clerks, etc. If you are interested in writing a Judicial Profile, we would like to hear from you. Please send an email to social@fedbar.org.
A
- Acosta, Hon. Raymond
District of Puerto Rico - Adams, Hon. Andrew III
Muscogee (Creek) Nation Su•
List of current United States district judges
List of all current American federal and territorial district judges
Main article: United States district judge
The following is a list of all current judges of the United States district and territorial courts. The list includes both "active" and "senior" judges, both of whom hear and decide cases. There are 89 districts in the 50 states, with a total of 94 districts including four territories and the District of Columbia. Each of the 50 states has between one and four Article III district courts, and the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico each have one Article III district court. Article III judges have lifetime tenure.
The insular areas of Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the United States Virgin Islands each have one Article IV territorial court. These courts are called "district courts" and exercise the same jurisdiction as district courts; however, Article IV territorial courts differ from Article III district courts in that territorial courts have judges who serve ten-year terms rather than lifetime tenures.
As of January 2025, Congress has authorized 677 permanent district judgeships, [1] though the number of actual judges will be higher than 677 because of some judges electing senior status. Onl